Welcome statement


Parting Words from Moristotle (07/31/2023)
tells how to access our archives
of art, poems, stories, serials, travelogues,
essays, reviews, interviews, correspondence….

Sunday, November 12, 2006

Karl Rove's Revenge

An "Obituary" of A.F. Flogger


There was a Bush hater named Flogger,
A feisty and outspoken blogger,
    Who, it turns out,
    Was, without doubt,
A double agent, a sorry hot dogger.

I received a telephone call yesterday from the widow of A.F. Flogger that her husband took his own life the day following the election, and, in his suicide note, he had asked her to tell me that he was sorry for what he had done. (I'd simply quote Flogger's suicide note, but Mrs. Flogger didn't share its very words with me because, she said, there is some question whether her husband actually died by his own hand. And she seemed to be saying that there was some possibility that the homicide detective who's investigating the case might want to talk with me....)

My newer readers will require some background on who A.F. Flogger was (or purported to be) and what it was that he was sorry for. It wasn't any one thing that he did. It wasn't that simple.

On July 19, I reported that "an embarrassed A.F. Flogger wished to make a statement":

Whoa! Hold on a minute. Flogger.com is not my website. I do not promote whipping or any other unspeakable sexual practices. The whole thing is a mistake. I mistyped the name of my registered domain when I first approached Moristotle about leaving blogger.com and coming with me. He simply passed along what I typed. I didn't notice it. You know how people tend to see what they think is there anyway.

Besides, I had told Moristotle that my website hadn't been launched yet. That's undoubtedly why he didn't check flogger.com out. My website name will be pflogger.com. "P" is for "political," of course. Or, I suppose it could stand for "‘president’" or "pissant," since the main object of my brand of political flogging is George W. Bush.

The "flogger.com" episode was embarrassing to me, at best. The reader in the world who has followed this blog longer than any other, Steve P, had just pointed out to me that flogger.com seemed to be actively engaged in promoting the joys (and anguishes) of sadomasochistic sexual practices. (One of the many things that I admire and depend on in Steve P is his commitment to checking the facts. I hadn't visited flogger.com before mentioning it on my blog, but he did. I'll always be grateful that he did so.)

Anyway, Flogger had first come to me purporting to be trying to recruit me to "go with him" and do my political blogging on his blog. I liked his suggestion that the term flogging was most apt for a political blogger of my stripe (and, he implied, of his stripe as well).

He made his very first appearance on Moristotle on July 9:

I found a comment here this morning from a man (he said) who identified himself only as "a fellow flogger" and the creator of a website (not yet launched) whose domain address he has registered as flogger.com. Frankly, he admitted, he wanted me to quit blogger.com and come with him. He'd give me a "flogspot," he said.

To show his goodwill, he gave me his most recent political joke and said I was free to use it (anyway, he could use the publicity), so long as I would consider his proposal.

Okay, I'll consider it.
"What's the difference between a Texas pissant and 'President' George W. Bush?...A pissant doesn't need quotation marks."

On July 12, A.F. Flogger warned me that if I came with him, he'd "want [me] to slant [my] poetry along political lines." And he gave me an example:

There is a throw-up word—it rhymes with ‘whoosh’—
That I want never ever hear...so shush!
    The throw-up word—first letter ‘B’
    Followed by a different three—
That I want never ever hear is ‘----’.

Of course, readers familiar with my anti-Bush stance will understand that I had to find A.F. Flogger appealing. Then, on July 17, I reported that Flogger was predicting "that Arizona's voter lottery will provoke a Republican backlash." This seemed such a reasonable prediction (Arizona voters did reject the proposal) that it strengthened my opinion of A.F. Flogger even more.

Then came the aforementioned revelation of July 19, unearthed by Steve P. I should have been more suspicious of Flogger's really flimsy excuse that he had mistyped the address of his registered domain. For, you see, what Flogger was sorry for—Mrs. Flogger told me yesterday—was that he had approached me with the sole object of trying to discredit me in the eyes of the blog-reading public.

I asked Mrs. Flogger if she knew why her husband had done that. At first she seemed reluctant to go there, and she finally spoke only very guardedly, as though someone might be looking over her shoulder.

Karl Rove had commissioned him to do it, she said.

"That was in the suicide note?" I asked.

"Oh, God no!" she said. "And he didn't actually say it was Karl Rove...but I heard him talking in his sleep on several occasions before he killed himself...or...."

She went on to describe some of her husband's mumblings and how the mention of Karl Rove had actually explained a lot of things to her personally about her husband's recent political activities.

"Karl Rove really does have his tentacles in a lot of things that are going on," she said.

I nodded, hoping she'd say more.

"I've been reading your blog," she said. "You know that 'pissant' joke?"

"Of course," I said, my breath having stopped, I was so expectant what she might say next.

"That's what Karl Rove called Bush. His nickname for Bush."

I couldn't believe what I'd heard. "Would you repeat that," I said.

"Karl Rove's secret nickname for Bush was 'Pissant.' You see—and this is one thing my husband did tell me when he was awake—Karl Rove absolutely hated it that Bush called him 'Turd Blossom.' Hated it. He called Bush 'The Texas Pissant' behind his back."

I still wasn't breathing.

"Karl Rove wrote that joke."

14 comments:

  1. Poor Flogger. Requiescat in pace. Exposed as a poseur blogger, the anti-blogger -- what an ignoble end. Somebody fetch the silver bullets. I wonder if there are weird sexual practices where he is? Oh, I know -- let's ask Karl Rove. If anyone shows, Rove knows. I say we officially appoint Steve to keep an eye on flogger.com, just to be sure -- and to head off any budding resurrection. I think you can safely breathe now; he looks stone cold dead to me. And I know dead when I see it.

    When I croak off, I want you to write my obit.:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oooh! Mine, too!

    Here lies Southern Writer
    Who often wrote into the nighter ...

    or something good.

    Funny post, Mori.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My dears, would that I could have the slightest reasonable expectation of surviving either of you!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ahem. I'm old as dirt. I could go tomorrow. You'd better go ahead and write me up, just in case. It's always good to be prepared. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Okay, I'm game. May I "interview" you (written questions via email) to have some pithy background for inclusion? Or alternatively, please provide some of your own choosing...<smile>.

    Your comment reminds me of a question I asked a lady one time. We'd been waiting together in the ophthalmologist's "dark room" while our eyes dilated for examination, and we had been chatting and laughing amicably. She said something about being "old enough to know," and I asked, "How old are you anyway?" She took my hand and said, "Young man, I'm awfully old!"

    By the way, Serena, I'd already clued Southern Writer that today's post was a "short story." Did you realize that?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course, you may. The premise of the obit, however, will be very simple: "She did it her way, right or not. And she laughed as hard as anybody else when she fell on her butt."

    I was in a bit of a quandary about how to categorize the post. I was thinking satirical essay, treatise, etc. But -- a short story it is!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Okay, I'll try to formulate some useful questions, but give me some time. I.e., let's neither of us kick off before I get this done. As though either of has any ultimate control over it. (As you acknowledged in an earlier comment.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am seizing control and hereby decreeing that I have at least a week. If you feel yourself slipping away in the interim, you can just keep it short and simple: "Serena Joy lived, and then she kicked off. But she did it on her terms. And if you say anything unkind behind her cold, dead back, she WILL haunt you. Neener-neener-neener."

    ReplyDelete
  9. I begin to suspect that I am really not cut out to write an obituary for you, Serena. At this moment, I am almost totally lacking in confidence that I could do anything that deserved to be read by anybody, including myself!

    Maybe I'm over-imagining what such an obit might be. If you only meant that I might try to do a limerick, I think I could manage that, but I thought that maybe you meant I should try to write another Borgesian-style short story...<yikes!>

    ReplyDelete
  10. I wouldn't ask you to write another Borgesian-style short story. I'll be happy with a limerick -- which can also be my epitaph.:)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm sure that I can manage this! Thanks for refocusing the task at hand (although it is probably my fault for having focused wrong in the first place).

    Or maybe I just naturally and automatically set high (and sometimes too high) expectations of myself? <smile>

    ReplyDelete
  12. I can't wait to see what you come up with. {grin}

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yesterday I submitted this post electronically (as a "short short story") to the fiction editor of The New Yorker Magazine. I'm hoping that the magazine that published so many short stories by Donald Barthelme will not only find my story well enough written for them, but also find irresistibly clever my use of real (but fictional) blog posts. Hope springs eternal, right?

    ReplyDelete