Welcome statement


“Parting Words from Moristotle” (07/31/2023) tells how to access our
archives of art, poems, stories, serials, interviews, travelogues….
Showing posts with label John Allen Paulos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Allen Paulos. Show all posts

Monday, September 28, 2020

11 Years Ago Yesterday:
Animating spirit, first cause

By Moristotle

[Originally published on September 27, 2009.]

A walk in the gentle woods of Hillsborough, North Carolina yesterday prompted me to revisit what it is about “God” that I don’t believe. Not the walk, actually, but the conversation with my good friend Ralph, with whom I walked and talked. Ralph said two things that gave me pause. The first was that he finds it impossible to deny that God exists. While he is as clear as I am that “the Christian God,” as he puts it, does not exist, he says that God as the animating spirit of the universe, its first cause, does necessarily exist.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Good or bad, with or without religion

It seems to me that with or without religion good people will behave well and bad people will do evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
So said Nobel-laureate physicist Steven Weinberg in an interview on PBS (in the early 1990's, I think, but I couldn't confirm it).
    "Still," comments John Allen Paulos, in his instructive little book, Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up:
people do often vigorously insist that religious beliefs are necessary to ensure moral behavior. Though the claim is quite clearly false of people in general, there is a sense in which it might be true if one has been brought up in a very religious environment. A classic experiment on the so-called overjustification effect by the psychologists David Greene, Betty Sternberg, and Mark Lepper is relevant. They exposed fourth- and fifth-grade students to a variety of intriguing mathematical games and measured the time the children played them. They found that the children seemed to possess a good deal of intrinsic interest in the games. The games were fun. After a few days, however, the psychologists began to reward the children for playing; those playing them more had a better chance of winning the prizes offered. The prizes did increase the time the children played the games, but when the prizes were stopped, the children lost almost all interest in the games and rarely played them. The extrinsic rewards had undercut the children's intrinsic interest. Likewise, religious injunctions and rewards promised to children for being good might, if repudiated in later life, drastically reduce the time people spend playing the "being good" game. This is another reason not to base ethics on religious teachings. [pp. 140-141]
Fortunately, my own reasons for giving up God and religion were fundamentally moral. My moral values remained intact and may even have been fortified because of my realization that I alone am responsible for the morality of my actions and, ultimately, for who I am.
    Besides, I know a number of people whose moral sensibility seems to me superior to God's as "He" is portrayed in the scriptures of the Abrahamic religions.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Ambrose Bierce on prayer

To try to get away from the depressing spectacle of the "health care debate" (including, alas, President Obama's unexpected weakness in attempting to achieve a political compromise by trying to appease people who won't be appeased—like Senator Charles E. Grassley, “who feeds the death panel smear, warning that reform will 'pull the plug on grandma'”1), I'm reading an entertaining book, John Allen Paulos's 2008 Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, which in passing quotes Ambrose Bierce's Devil's Dictionary (1911):
Pray, v. To ask the laws of the universe to be annulled on behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
Mention of Bierce immediately follows Paulos's own statement:
Subjective arguments for God's existence generally claim to establish even more than a connection between God and a particular religion. They claim to establish the existence of a personal God [emphasis mine] who cares about us individually, listens to our prayers, and occasionally intervenes with a miracle on our behalf. An understandable wish perhaps, but absurd nonetheless. [pp. 80-81]

Absurd as it is, I have once or twice caught myself beginning to pray for health care reform to become a concerted, rational undertaking.

_______________
  1. From Paul Krugman's column, "Obama's Trust Problem," published yesterday on The New York Times website.