From "An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish"
By Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)
The Ages of Faith, which are praised by our neo-scholastics, were the time when the clergy had things all their own way. Daily life was full of miracles wrought by saints and wizardry petpetrated by devils and necromancers. Many thousands of witches were burnt at the stake.
Men's sins were punished by pestilence and famine, by earthquake, flood, and fire. And yet, strange to say, they were even more sinful than they are now-a-days. Very little was known scientifically about the world. A few learned men remembered Greek proofs that the earth is round, but most people made fun of the notion that there are antipodes. To suppose that there are human beings at the antipodes was heresy. It was generally held (though modern Catholics take a milder view) that the immense majority of mankind are damned. Dangers were held to lurk at every turn. Devils would settle on the food that monks were about to eat, and would take possession of the bodies of incautious feeders who omitted to make the sign of the Cross before each mouthful. Old-fashioned people still say "bless you" when one sneezes, but they have forgotten the reason for the custom. The reason was that people were thought to sneeze out their souls, and before their souls could get back lurking demons were apt to enter the unsouled body; but if any one said "God bless you," the demons were frightened off.
Throughout the last 400 years, during which the growth of science had gradually shown men how to acquire knowledge of the ways of nature and mastery over natural forces, the clergy have fought a losing battle against science, in astronomy and geology, in anatomy and physiology, in biology and psychology and sociology. Ousted from one position, they have taken up another. After being worsted in astronomy, they did their best to prevent the rise of geology; they fought against Darwin in biology, and at the present time they fight against scientific theories of psychology and education. At each stage, they try to make the public forget their earlier obscurantism, in order that their present obscurantism may not be recognized for what it is....
As soon as we abandon our own reason, and are content to rely upon authority, there is no end to our troubles. Whose authority? The Old Testament? The New Testament? The Koran? In practice, people choose the book considered sacred by the community in which they are born, and out of that book they choose the parts they like, ignoring the others. At one time, the most influential text in the Bible was: "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." Now-a-days, people pass over this text, in silence if possible; if not, with an apology. And so, even when we have a sacred book, we still choose as truth whatever suits our own prejudices. No Catholic, for instance, takes seriously the text which says that a bishop should be the husband of one wife.
People's beliefs have various causes. One is that there is some evidence for the belief in question. We apply this to matters of fact, such as "what is so-and-so's telephone number?" or "who won the World Series?" But as soon as it comes to anything more debatable, the causes of belief become less defensible. We believe, first and foremost, what makes us feel that we are fine fellows. Mr. Homo, if he has a good digestion and a sound income, thinks to himself how much more sensible he is than his neighbor so-and-so, who married a flighty wife and is always losing money. He thinks how superior his city is to the one 50 miles away....
Commentary
By Morris Dean
Even today in regions far and wide
Fearful people shove evidence aside—
Ages of faith
Perpetuate—
And witches must be shouted out and tried.
_______________
Copyright © 2013 by Morris Dean
By Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)
The Ages of Faith, which are praised by our neo-scholastics, were the time when the clergy had things all their own way. Daily life was full of miracles wrought by saints and wizardry petpetrated by devils and necromancers. Many thousands of witches were burnt at the stake.
Men's sins were punished by pestilence and famine, by earthquake, flood, and fire. And yet, strange to say, they were even more sinful than they are now-a-days. Very little was known scientifically about the world. A few learned men remembered Greek proofs that the earth is round, but most people made fun of the notion that there are antipodes. To suppose that there are human beings at the antipodes was heresy. It was generally held (though modern Catholics take a milder view) that the immense majority of mankind are damned. Dangers were held to lurk at every turn. Devils would settle on the food that monks were about to eat, and would take possession of the bodies of incautious feeders who omitted to make the sign of the Cross before each mouthful. Old-fashioned people still say "bless you" when one sneezes, but they have forgotten the reason for the custom. The reason was that people were thought to sneeze out their souls, and before their souls could get back lurking demons were apt to enter the unsouled body; but if any one said "God bless you," the demons were frightened off.
Throughout the last 400 years, during which the growth of science had gradually shown men how to acquire knowledge of the ways of nature and mastery over natural forces, the clergy have fought a losing battle against science, in astronomy and geology, in anatomy and physiology, in biology and psychology and sociology. Ousted from one position, they have taken up another. After being worsted in astronomy, they did their best to prevent the rise of geology; they fought against Darwin in biology, and at the present time they fight against scientific theories of psychology and education. At each stage, they try to make the public forget their earlier obscurantism, in order that their present obscurantism may not be recognized for what it is....
As soon as we abandon our own reason, and are content to rely upon authority, there is no end to our troubles. Whose authority? The Old Testament? The New Testament? The Koran? In practice, people choose the book considered sacred by the community in which they are born, and out of that book they choose the parts they like, ignoring the others. At one time, the most influential text in the Bible was: "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." Now-a-days, people pass over this text, in silence if possible; if not, with an apology. And so, even when we have a sacred book, we still choose as truth whatever suits our own prejudices. No Catholic, for instance, takes seriously the text which says that a bishop should be the husband of one wife.
People's beliefs have various causes. One is that there is some evidence for the belief in question. We apply this to matters of fact, such as "what is so-and-so's telephone number?" or "who won the World Series?" But as soon as it comes to anything more debatable, the causes of belief become less defensible. We believe, first and foremost, what makes us feel that we are fine fellows. Mr. Homo, if he has a good digestion and a sound income, thinks to himself how much more sensible he is than his neighbor so-and-so, who married a flighty wife and is always losing money. He thinks how superior his city is to the one 50 miles away....
Commentary
By Morris Dean
Even today in regions far and wide
Fearful people shove evidence aside—
Ages of faith
Perpetuate—
And witches must be shouted out and tried.
_______________
Copyright © 2013 by Morris Dean
Please comment |
Thank you for sharing Bertrand Russell's text and your comment. It is difficult to understand how an organization still has such clout in the minds of otherwise intelligent people, when it has a two-thousand year record of ultimately being proven wrong in all its past positions.
ReplyDeleteI had a person tell me if it was fact then it would not be faith. That faith was a belief in that which cannot be proven. To him, it made sense. To me it was bull____. But it does explain why the church or and the Bible can be wrong and the believers keep on believing. There is an old saying: "There are no atheist in a Foxhole."
ReplyDeleteKonotahe, while I will agree that "belief in that which cannot be proven" could be a great definition of the word faith, have you any theories on why people choose to believe in that which cannot be proven, instead of that which can be proven?
ReplyDeleteHoping, believing, or even praying, can't hurt if someone is so unfortunate as to wind up in a foxhole, but isn't it the people who keep shooting who make the difference?
Moto and Kono, I have thinking to unload,
ReplyDeleteBut my wife and I are driving on the road,
So I will wait--
It won't be late--
Till I'm back at the keyboard in our abode.
Texting and driving is never a good thing. Watch out for that cow.
DeleteI NEVER text while driving. My wife was behind the wheel; I just didn't want to write at length with one finger on my Droid's monitor keyboard.
DeleteWe're home now, but a few chores need attention.
Moto these are all interesting questions. There are things that happen in this world that no one can explain. Some people like most on this blog except that just because we cannot explain it today doesn't mean that someday it will not be explained. But, that is only if you have faith in that kind of a thing.
ReplyDeleteAnd the Foxhole: the reason for the praying, crying, curing, and will to believe anything that will get you out alive, is because you have no control over the guys shooting at you.
I remember when I was told I had cancer, I said a prayer. Not for live or to be cured. I said to God,no one or just to myself: "If I have to die; please give the strength to do this right." I think we all say a prayer in times of hardship, even if we don't call them prayers. Maybe it is just words on the wind, but sometimes there are things we need to say that we want only the wind to hear.