A review of G.K. Chesterton’s book Orthodoxy
By Kyle Garza
Chesterton’s Orthodoxy stands at a crossroads uncommon in apologetics [the discipline of defending a position (often religious) through the systematic use of information]: it melds several forms of discourse in a way the reviewer did not think possible, for it combines cogent reasoning with testimony and—quite unexpectedly—poetry, and these are listed in this order purposefully for reasons that will soon be explained. The text is a continuation of a dialogue in the early 20th century between Chesterton and his modern philosophical opponents. Having refuted the philosophies and the philosophers of his day in his collection of essays titled Heretics, Chesterton was soon rejoined by a demand to offer an alternative philosophy to the moderns'. Orthodoxy is that offer.
By Kyle Garza
Chesterton’s Orthodoxy stands at a crossroads uncommon in apologetics [the discipline of defending a position (often religious) through the systematic use of information]: it melds several forms of discourse in a way the reviewer did not think possible, for it combines cogent reasoning with testimony and—quite unexpectedly—poetry, and these are listed in this order purposefully for reasons that will soon be explained. The text is a continuation of a dialogue in the early 20th century between Chesterton and his modern philosophical opponents. Having refuted the philosophies and the philosophers of his day in his collection of essays titled Heretics, Chesterton was soon rejoined by a demand to offer an alternative philosophy to the moderns'. Orthodoxy is that offer.