Click to read |
It was my wife. "The Chapel Hill Herald published a letter of yours this morning."
"Yes, I know."
I'd looked at p. 2 immediately after collecting the paper from the driveway and was surprised to see my letter printed there, looking longer on the page than it had in the submission box. (In a comment on Monday—"'Daughters of thy uncles and aunts'"—I expressed doubt that the paper would print my potentially explosive missive.)
Maybe I was even apprehensive that it would print it. I had come to feel unsure about my tactic of appropriating Hurley's logical space for the purpose of extending his criticism of Islam to Christianity. After all, my letter was suggesting that a Christian's belief in heavenly reward for assenting to the literal truth of a myth borrowed from pagan precursors to Christianity was no more credible than a Muslim's belief in heavenly reward for blowing himself up in order to kill a few enemies of Islam.
But I continued to hope that my concluding "joke" about swimming trunks had lightened the tone, if not enough to defuse the bomb, at least enough to dampen its explosion in this nominally Christian society.
A follower emailed me: You are going to become quite the Celeb in your neck of the woods if the editor keeps publishing your letters.
ReplyDelete<ha> That might or might not be a good thing. I do wonder, now, where the editor is coming from. Is he in my corner? Even if he might himself not want to offend any die-hard Christians among the paper's readership (he might dismiss Muslims as negligible, although I do see quite a fair number of women on the UNC-CH campus wearing a scarf over their head), he could assume that the signed letter-writer would take whatever brunt (although I suppose it's possible that the paper might receive a letter complaining of the paper's policy of printing such slurs on the Christian religion, or that their office might be bombed by a Jihadist).
Or the editor could, I suppose, be only half-awake and somehow have missed the slur. Maybe he only saw my signature and thought, Hey, we'll print anything by this guy! <laugh>
Anyway, I discovered from this "exercise" that I feel a good deal more relaxed criticizing religion on my blog than I do in a local newspaper.
It's not without its excitement, though, although I of course don't want the excitement to rise to a sense of terror when I see a burning cross or something in my front yard. A prayer group kneeling with their Bibles?
A burning cross and a prayer group kneeling with their Bibles. Wow, that would be something. Ask Carolyn to take at least one photo. I bet the editor would publish it.
ReplyDeleteA powerful image. If necessary, stage it.
ReplyDeleteSteve, your suggestion that Carolyn photograph the event suggests either that I'd be too stressed to operate a camera or that I'd be in the frame, "posing" with my visitors?
ReplyDeleteKen, the thought had occurred to me that one of my blog's followers, having read these comments, might gather a troupe of actors...but I hadn't thought of gathering one myself. Now that is interesting....
By the way, I'm delighted to have a comment from you, after way too long a time as far as I'm concerned.
No letters at all in this morning's Chapel Hill Herald. Has the Hurley-Dean correspondence prompted the paper to re-evaluate its letters policy? Amusing thought.