By Victor L. Midyett
My wish would be for the National Football League and its players to be open to a serious discussion about the American flag and our national anthem’s being off limits to anything other than our nation’s traditional habits of somber respect.
Is change needed? Yes, and I completely agree with the players’ issues. Their reason is righteous. Their “tool” to advocate change is not.
I believe our choice of “tools” for effective change is philosophically based. There are many ways to encourage change, but from a philosophical point of view, as I see it, there are two main ones, and they are opposed:
Well, we need to further our “good,” not our “bad or ugly.” The problem is societal, not political.
Here is an example to make clearer the philosophy of pushing versus encouraging. Australia has TV ads, banners, posters, and signs at every sports field, school, shop entrance, doctor’s office, library, and even public/government office that display two simple words:
Going against America’s national tradition of standing for the national anthem, by taking a knee to the flag and the anthem, is not respectful; the act disrespects the fallen who fought for our freedom. In my opinion, it is pushing against; it discourages our good, our respectfulness, our human decency. It creates yet another disagreement, and that should be obvious to everyone by now.
Over the years, I have witnessed both ways of trying to “encourage” change, and I offer myself as evidence for which is more effective. If I as a customer need a “wrong” to be corrected, I can proceed with obvious, even condescending aggravation, or I can choose respect. I have tried both, and choosing respect wins hands-down.
So many people in contemporary American society seem to want to first get their hackles up and push against. While the NFL players are most definitely trying to correct a wrong, there has to be a better way than by creating yet another wrong.
NFL players, you now have the perfect stepping-stone. You could announce:
If we choose respect, we are far more likely to have it returned.
Or think of it this way. If we can’t lead a horse forward with a handful of thistle, we may want to choose a carrot. No self-respecting horse would refuse a carrot.
My wish would be for the National Football League and its players to be open to a serious discussion about the American flag and our national anthem’s being off limits to anything other than our nation’s traditional habits of somber respect.
Is change needed? Yes, and I completely agree with the players’ issues. Their reason is righteous. Their “tool” to advocate change is not.
I believe our choice of “tools” for effective change is philosophically based. There are many ways to encourage change, but from a philosophical point of view, as I see it, there are two main ones, and they are opposed:
- Push against (tool = hammer)
- Encourage forward (tool = piper’s flute)
Well, we need to further our “good,” not our “bad or ugly.” The problem is societal, not political.
Here is an example to make clearer the philosophy of pushing versus encouraging. Australia has TV ads, banners, posters, and signs at every sports field, school, shop entrance, doctor’s office, library, and even public/government office that display two simple words:
Choose RespectAs far as I can tell during the past two years, it has been effective! Every time I myself see it on the front of a service counter, I am reminded to be nice. The message is a tool that encourages an issue forward to better behavior and a better mindset for all.
Going against America’s national tradition of standing for the national anthem, by taking a knee to the flag and the anthem, is not respectful; the act disrespects the fallen who fought for our freedom. In my opinion, it is pushing against; it discourages our good, our respectfulness, our human decency. It creates yet another disagreement, and that should be obvious to everyone by now.
Over the years, I have witnessed both ways of trying to “encourage” change, and I offer myself as evidence for which is more effective. If I as a customer need a “wrong” to be corrected, I can proceed with obvious, even condescending aggravation, or I can choose respect. I have tried both, and choosing respect wins hands-down.
So many people in contemporary American society seem to want to first get their hackles up and push against. While the NFL players are most definitely trying to correct a wrong, there has to be a better way than by creating yet another wrong.
NFL players, you now have the perfect stepping-stone. You could announce:
Now that we have the world’s attention, allow us to make the next and more positive step forward. Let us all stand together for our nation, our flag, and our anthem, and lead by example by choosing respect for all.Being careful in your wording allows you to “save face,” defuse both issues, and start a positive movement forward.
If we choose respect, we are far more likely to have it returned.
Or think of it this way. If we can’t lead a horse forward with a handful of thistle, we may want to choose a carrot. No self-respecting horse would refuse a carrot.
Copyright © 2017 by Victor L. Midyett |
I shared and got some good comments on it. For the most part they agree it is Food for Thought.
ReplyDeleteVickie, thanks for summarizing the feedback. You say that “for the most part” the comments were supportive or positive. What negative or critical things did you hear, and were they constructive?
DeleteWonderful Vickie! Thanks very much. Now let's make it for "consumption" and satisfaction. ha!
ReplyDeleteHaving looked at the several responses that Vickie got on her FB page, there is one I have copied to share here that might be of interest - Excellent! Having just returned from "OZ" those "Choose Respect" signs are subtly visible virtually everywhere. Time for us to take a lesson. Thanks
ReplyDeleteVic, as I read your column yet again and again, the stronger your recommendation comes across, except that I now wish you had said more about what the NFL players might do to “start a positive movement forward.”
ReplyDeleteIt was not a purposeful thing that I didn't say more. I believe I gave them the start. They NEED TO OWN and create any positive movement for themselves. One very simple thing would be for them to make and encourage other to make banners, stickers, etc., with those two simple words like Aussie has. In the first instance though, an official news statement similar to the one I offered.
ReplyDelete