Welcome statement


Parting Words from Moristotle” (07/31/2023)
tells how to access our archives
of art, poems, stories, serials, travelogues,
essays, reviews, interviews, correspondence….

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Thor's Day: Socialism and the Christian Right

How can anyone be a Conservative and follow Jesus?

By Ed Rogers

Most Christians, if asked, will tell you that Socialism is anti-religion. Some non-believers call themselves socialist without other beliefs contradicting it, but almost any conservative Christian who calls himself a socialist is snared in a dilemma.
    From my reading of the bibles of the Christian religion, I find very few true Christians among the millions who profess to believe the teachings of Jesus Christ. There is no denying that Jesus and his merry band of men and women were socialists. They bordered on being communists, with Jesus assuming the authoritarian role and Judas Iscariot's serving as his trusted treasurer: receiving the money everyone turned over to him and handing it out depending on people's needs. Food and drink were also a communal affair. In every regard, Jesus and his followers placed the community's needs above the individual's: Socialism at its purist.
    I ask, WWJS [what would Jesus say] about his socialist brothers and sisters today? It gets old listening to so-called Christians crying about Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson losing his job and about "the war on Christmas." Repeatedly it’s just the same hand-wringing over nothing, while they are cheering the cutting of food stamp programs and unemployment benefits. Robertson and his so-called clan will not miss a meal because he got fired.


Why is it that this godly community can only cry out when it's the wealthy who are called onto the carpet? The Robertson family is doing quite well. They were doing fine, financially, before the show. They would do fine without the show. However, millions are not doing well, and could use some Christian outrage for justice cried out on their behalf.
    Underlying all the crying about free speech is the total support of a bigot and a racist.
    I hoed cotton alongside blacks back in the fifties. With the sun setting in the western sky, we would walk that half-mile home. There was no singing. Hell, we were so tired there was very little talking. I would return to the white people’s house while my friends returned to a shotgun, with cardboard covering the cracks. In the summer, it was so hot they would sleep outside on quilts and in the winter, the wood burning cooking stove in the small kitchen and the small potbelly stove in the front room was all the heat they had. Their schoolhouses were a large version of the shotgun, which they called home. Their books and desks were hand-me-downs from the white schools. I spent many a cold day in their house and it was not fun. No matter how close you got to the potbelly stove, your front or your back would get cold. Try to learn anything while hungry and cold. This is the true picture of the “Jim Crow” south.
    In the summer, the white man that leased the land and the house from my great, grandmother, paid the black family for working the farm. Out of that pay, they would have to pay back the money, which, was loaned to them over the winter months when they could not work. There was no way they would ever get out of debt.


The reality is that far from being happy, they were no more than paid-slaves. These poor people were not stars in a Walt Disney movie with bluebirds landing on their shoulders, as Robertson would have the world believe and Conservative Christians espouse. Most worked themselves to death at a young age or died from cotton pesticides that farmers sprayed each year.
    The idiot Newt Gingrich compared Robertson to Pope Francis. Others have compared him to Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rosa Parks. Others warned of the End of Days. This is the face of the Christian religion. There came not a word—that I heard anyway—from the pulpits denouncing Robertson. Instead, churches called for supporting him with prayers.
    Christian apologists may defend their church's beliefs, but they are not crying foul against the right wing. The idea that Jesus would support corporations over poor people is insane, and I lay the blame at the feet of those who say they know the meaning of the Bible and its teachings.
    It's Christians who have walked away from Jesus's teachings and in the act driven the weak and the sick from their door. While thousands are going hungry, they may set up a food pantry and feed a few so they can drive home and feel good about themselves. And on Sundays they rush to their churches, close the doors, and listen lovingly to their preachers telling them the version of the Bible they're paying him to preach. Afterward, feeling all godly, they take the family out for the big Sunday Lunch and get home in time for a football kick-off.
    Jesus said to give away your wealth to the poor. Nowhere in the Bible is it written that Jesus said to cut food stamps and starve the poor. The big quote that so-called Christians like to throw out there is that Jesus said if you don’t work, nor shall you eat. Paul said this, not Jesus. [For more examples, see AlterNet's "Right-Wing Is Filled with Biblical Illiterates: They'd Be Shocked by Jesus' Teachings if They Ever Picked Up a Bible."]
    Where is the outrage? Christians ask us to believe in their God. Hell, they don’t even know their God. They should cut all the crap out of the Bible and read the words that are in red (at least in the editions that seek to call attention to Jesus's supposed utterances). Then they should ask themselves whether they believe Jesus was a Conservative or a Socialist. And if Jesus was a Socialist, how can anyone be a Conservative and follow him?
_______________
Copyright © 2014 by Ed Rogers

Comment box is located below

18 comments:

  1. THANK YOU, ED, on whose reading of the Bible [and my mother's & mine], if the Bible is to be believed, Jesus was a socialist. "And if Jesus was a Socialist," you ask, "how can anyone [have the antithetical values of a] Conservative and follow him?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, Morris, but I will never start my Thursday off with reading "Thor's Day" again. I just could not believe all the crap Ed stated in today's! I want to read happy, uplifting things. His rantings did not put any doubts in my mind about my own beliefs, but, oh, it is so negative and in my opinion ridiculous.

    Now, that is all I am going to say, so please do not try to get this going into an all-out war of words, I am not going there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous, different people write the "Thor's Day" column, so extreme displeasure with one week's column should not automatically transfer over to all future columns. In fact, NEXT WEEK's column is quite "believing," as you will see (if you give it a chance). In fact, I bet it's degree of believing will amaze you. Have faith!

      Delete
    2. Sorry. I had a temper tantrum. Thanks for not getting mad!

      Delete
    3. No apology required. I actually enjoyed your comment.

      Delete
  3. The truth isn't always nice to hear. I'm sorry I started your day off bad, but there are a lot of people's day that was worse. My rant is nothing when compared to the crying right wing Christians do when complaining about spending for social needs. There has to be a moral question asked about the teachings from the bible and the actions of those who, at the very least, pick leaders who don't up hold those teachings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I cannot appreciate an article that is so judgmental, generalized and irreverent. I am a conservative Christian and what you said is totally off the mark. My church donates generous amounts of food, money and supplies to victims of natural disasters worldwide. The members of my church are encouraged monthly to give money to a fund to help our members and other locals who are struggling financially. We live our lives in service to our families and communities. We love all people. This is what true Christians do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would like to point out that conservative right wing Christians invented being "judgmental". That and the idea if you shout a lie loud enough, and long enough, it becomes the truth. Feeding a few to make yourself feel good, is not caring for the poor---it just lets you feel like it.

      Delete
  5. Ed, as always, gives voice to sensible questions raised by the contradictions of the “Christian Right”, but I think a bit of historical perspective might give a bit of richness to the discussion. My reference for this is James Morone’s Hellfire Nation, published in 2003 by Yale University Press. Morone’s basic point is that Protestant religion has had a more significant impact on American politics than the orthodox narrative taught to us acknowledges. Written at the high point of the latest reactionary religious furor he attempted to demonstrate how American politics has been shaped by the many religious movement of the past four hundred years.

    Beginning, at the least, with the “Winthrop Covenant” of the Pilgrim colonizers of Massachusetts the governments of the states and the nation have reflected the values professed by their political leaders, but sometimes modified by popular movements rooted in the two revivalist “Great Awakenings” of the 18th and 19th centuries. As an example, the Abolitionist movement had it’s base in Northern Protestant churches before it became part of the political battles that ended in the Civil War. The Civil Rights movement of the last century was based in the Black churches of the south as well. Also, many of the dumber political ideas in American history, like Prohibition and the Comstock Act censorship of the mails grew from religious campaigns. Morone traces over the centuries the swing back and forth between the “Social Gospel” and fundamentalism, as economic interests and social problems change the country.

    So it is unfortunately nothing new or surprising that “conservative christians” base their reactionary attitudes on interpretations of what the gospels say that damage their own interests. Religion is always been intertwined with power, serving the interests of the wealthy, and often benefiting from the connection. The “Wobblies” (the I.W.W. of the 19th Century Labor Wars) called ministers “sky pilots” because they preached submission to the bosses, and claimed that “there’ll be pie in the sky bye and bye.” Of course this contradiction is inevitable- the monied families in a congregation pay to build and repair churches and pay salaries- if you antagonize them you start looking for a new job.

    In my work with Social Justice groups here in the Bay Area I’ve had an opportunity to see both the good and the harmful effects of religion on poor people, and entirely agree with Ed’s frustration with the “false consciousness”, like that of "Anonymous", which rules many minds. All we can do is keep standing for the “little guy” against those who use and abuse him or her.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Tom. You put it much better than I did and without the rant(smile)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jesus was not, is not, and will not be a socialist. He is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jesus was not a politician. His purpose wad to provide the way for all of us to live with God again. He also taught us to love and not judge. I do not think anyone but Jesus can dictate who a true Christian is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I fear that this will come as a terrible shock to Pat Robertson.

      Delete
    2. And the whole 700 club. Oh, remember the Baker's, what ever happened to Tammy---she was such a Gody person. Jesus was against the political machine of his day. And, the machine killed him in order to silence the protest. So why are today's Christians afraid to question those who claim to have the ear of God? Most, not all, Christians no longer believe the wife and children are property of the man. Not everything in the Bible can be applied to today's life. So why get so uptight if other aspects are questioned?

      Delete
  9. What the rest of us need to remember is that many people contribute mightily to their churches not for the benefit of their religion and collecting a very few extra dollars that actually trickle down to a few causes, but rather to build monuments to themselves so they can bask in the glory of being a member of the biggest and best church in town same as they do being a member of the elite local country club, or owning the fanciest boat in the marina. If people really cared about what their religious contributions did for the less fortunate, especially in times of disaster, they would put less money into pricey and garish stained glass and fancy stonework, and would put more money into the causes they falsely claim to care so much about. And they would also insist their religious-based business networking hotspot and social-club enterprise pay its fair share of taxes, instead of dodging that responsibility in a manner that would make a defense contractor blush.

    ReplyDelete